Sure you can always access your Gmail from m.gmail.com or even set up Outlook Mobile to load your Gmail, but sometimes you want an experience that looks more like your desktop Gmail. In case you hadn’t heard , Google has had a java version of Gmail for awhile now. If you use Gmail a lot then I suggest Java Gmail as you will find the interface very much similar to what you are used to.
It has many of the full browser features in an easier to access way than Pocket Internet Explorer’s version. If you want to give it a whirl direct your mobile browser to gmail.com/app. If you haven’t tried the mobile browser version than go to m.gmail.com. Enjoy!


June 25th, 2008 at 6:33 am
Good enough but still needs some improvements. First it is not retaining the HTML format of the body of the email. So when you reply to an email thread with HTML format it will lose all the nice Fonts/colors since they’re converted to text.
June 25th, 2008 at 9:55 am
Oh wow! This is sooo much better than getting my gmail through IMAP!
June 25th, 2008 at 2:40 pm
yea, but in the Jar EMU it cuts the bottom of the program off on mine, and I see that is not happening on your pics, so what is different?
June 26th, 2008 at 11:06 am
runs too slow on my device
June 27th, 2008 at 11:58 am
get mike how about telling us or at least me how you got gmail to look normal in jbed cause I have tried everything I could find on google. please
June 28th, 2008 at 10:41 am
reddragon72, if you can send me a pm in the forums with a screenshot of what you are seeing. That will help. Also have you made any changes to Java on your phone? Go to Start > Applications > Java Applications > Menu > About > and tell me what build ID it has listed.
July 1st, 2008 at 9:45 pm
why does it say that this MIDlet is untrusted
July 6th, 2008 at 12:37 am
Is this free to download if I use my Wifi connection to download it?
July 22nd, 2008 at 9:00 am
Anyone else noticing when using the number keys as shortcuts (delete, archive, etc) pressing once causes it to delete two messages instead of one?